Ἅγιος ὁ Θεός, Ἅγιος ἰσχυρός, Ἅγιος ἀθάνατος, ἐλέησον ἡμᾶςKatholikon

Library › Palladius › Dialogue on the Life of St John Chrysostom

Dialogue on the Life of St John Chrysostom

Palladius, tr. Moore, 1921

9. Intrigues and Violence at Constantinople

Chrysostom’s Expulsion and Return

Thus was John ejected from the Church;1 a court official was despatched for the purpose, with a body of soldiers, as if it was an expedition against barbarians. On his expulsion he went first to the country district of Prametum, in Bithynia.2 But only a single day had passed, when a catastrophe 3 occurred in the royal palace, which caused such alarm, that a few days afterwards they recalled John, through a notary of the household, and restored him to his own throne.4 So Theophilus, with the Egyptian bishops, secured his own safety by flight; for the populace wished to drown him.5

But two months later, recovering from their wound, they again uplifted themselves against John; and as they could not find a promising opening, they sent to the clever man who managed such things at Alexandria, to this effect: Do you either come here again to take the lead in the campaign against John, or, if you will not do this for fear of the people, suggest to us some scheme, so that we may make a beginning.

Theophilus’ New Ground of Accusation

In answer to this, Theophilus did not go himself, remembering how he had escaped, but sent three miserable bishops, Paul, and Poimen, and another, newly consecrated, and at the same time despatched certain canons,6 which the Arians had framed against the blessed Athanasius, suggesting that by use of these they might manipulate a suit against John for having on his own initiative re-entered his bishopric after deposition. For Theophilus is naturally an impetuous person, headstrong, bold, and extraordinarily fond of quarrelling; whatever it be that presents itself to his vision, he rushes at it in needless haste, without any restraint, giving himself no time for judgment or consideration. So he proceeded with a mad fury which carried him beyond the bounds of order, to secure John’s submission, and in sure confidence in the verdict passed upon him, vigorously opposed all who wished to bring a counter-charge; his one aim, as ever, being to show that his own judgment and decision conquered and prevailed.

The Plotters and the Plot

Knowing his character, his agents fell in with his scheme. They summoned metropolitans and bishops from Syria, Cappadocia, and the whole province of Phrygia, and Pontus, to a conference at Constantinople. These on their arrival communicated with John in accordance with the canons, so as not to repeat their first mistake. The authorities were annoyed to hear of their act of communion; Theodorus, the respected Bishop of Tyana, aware of the conspiracy from the information which had reached his ears, refused to join in the hasty action of Theophilus, and deserted the main body without further concern, bidding a long farewell to the capital as he retired to his own Church. He fortified his own province with the rampart of his piety, and continued to the end in the communion of the faithful of Rome, to whom Paul bears witness in the words, “Your faith is spoken of in all the world.” 7 On the other hand, Pharetrius, Bishop of Caesarea, near Mount Argaeus, alarmed beyond measure, like a little child frightened by a bogey, without even leaving his own city, conferred by letters with John’s enemies, although he had not even been invited to take any part in the matter; in his ignorance of episcopacy, he knew no better. Leontius, Bishop of Ancyra in Galatia, joined with Ammonius, Bishop of Burnt Laodicea,8 in burning the church. These two, yielding to the threats of the authorities, and at the same beguiled by the hope of gifts from the king, at the second session made a vile suggestion to the party of Acacius and Antiochus: namely, that Theophilus’ judgment, which was no judgment, should prevail, and that no opportunity should be given to John even to defend himself, appealing to the canons sent by Theophilus, which the forty bishops in communion with Arius 9 had passed, containing the clause, “If any bishop or priest who has been justly or unjustly deposed of his own initiative re-enters his Church, without sanction of a synod; such an one shall thereafter have no opportunity of defence, but shall be absolutely excluded.” This canon was rejected, as being illegal and passed by illegal persons, at Sardica,10 by the bishops of Rome, Italy, Illyria, Macedonia, and Greece, as you know better than I, my famous friend Theodorus, when Liberius, or rather Julius,11 in the reign of Constans received into communion Athanasius and Marcellus of Galatia, on whose account the canon was laid down.

The Question of Canon Law

This wonderful pair, Ammonius and Leontius, formed a league with Acacius and Antiochus, and Cyrinus of Chalcedon,12 and Severianus, and came before the king, recommending that ten bishops of John’s party, which numbered more than forty, should be summoned, to maintain the authority of the canons; as some asserted that they were the work of orthodox persons, while others maintained that they were of Arian origin. However, Elpidius,13 old in spirit and in the years which had whitened his head, Bishop of Laodicea in Syria, and Tranquilius, with their supporters, came and urged upon the king that John ought not to be unreasonably ejected. “For,” they said, “John had not been previously deposed, but was expelled by the civil official; nor did he re-enter it upon his own initiative, but obeyed the order of your piety, conveyed by a notary; moreover, we can prove that the canons to which they appeal are of heretical origin.”

John’s opponents continued very improperly to press their views, some shouting at the top of their voices, others, wild with excitement, impudently gesticulating, and twitching their chests in the presence of the king. Then Elpidius, a most profound student of Church law, in a moment of silence said meekly to the king: “Your majesty, let us not trouble your gentleness further, but let this be done; let our brothers Acacius and Antiochus subscribe the canons which they put forward as the work of orthodox persons, and declare themselves to be of the same faith as those who issued them.14 Then the whole dispute is at an end.”

Failure of the Plot

The king noted the simplicity of the solution proposed, and said to Antiochus, with a smile, “Nothing could be better.” The king was throughout entirely free from blame; it was others who altered his excellent decrees. Severianus and his party reeled, and began to swirl against one another like water that has burst its bounds; they were struck dumb at the bishop’s thoughtful observation, and at the opinion expressed by the king. Their faces turned livid, but in the king’s audience chamber they had to restrain themselves. So they promised, sorely against their will, to subscribe the canons, and departed. But as they were afraid of being worsted, they did not carry out their promise, on the ground that it was given against their will; and began instead to devise means to secure John’s expulsion.

In these various manœuvres and counter-manœuvres nine or ten months passed, John foregathering with his forty-two bishops, while the people enjoyed the benefit of his teaching with much gladness. For the unselfish mind always expresses itself with greater grace and power in times of difficulty.15

The Emperor takes the Side of the Enemy

Such was the state of things when the Lord’s fast recurred, like the spring which puts forth its blossoms year by year. Again Antiochus and his party approached the king, in private, and informed him that John had been deposed, begging him to order his expulsion at the approaching Paschal season,16 and the king, wearied by their importunity, could not but listen to them, seeing that they were bishops. For the true priest or bishop knows not falsehood; these titles belong to the higher sphere, since there is nothing more priestly or more episcopal than God, for it is God Who is the bishop 17 and beholder of all things. The true bishop, then, or the true priest, inasmuch as he bears these titles in fellowship with God, ought also to be in fellowship with Him in His actions. The king accordingly sent word to John, “Leave the Church.” “I have received this Church,” John sent word back, “from God our Saviour, for the care of the salvation of the people, and I cannot desert it; if, then, this is your will—for the city is yours—thrust me out by force, that I may plead your authority in defence of my desertion of my post.”

Chrysostom Ejected by the Civil Power

So they sent men from the palace, with a certain show of respect, and ejected him; but in apprehension of a possible visitation of the wrath of God, bade him stay in the bishop’s house for the time being, so that if any misfortune should occur which affected them, they could at once appease the Divinity by restoring him to the Church, while if nothing happened, they could proceed further against him, as Pharaoh did against Moses.

The Storm Gathers

Meanwhile, the Great Sabbath drew near, in which the Saviour spoiled Hades by His crucifixion. Again they sent word to John, “Leave the Church”; to which he sent a suitable reply. So the king, in consideration of the sanctity of the day, and the disturbed state of the city, summoned Acacius and Antiochus, and said to them, “What is to be done? Take care that you are not acting unadvisedly.” Then the worthies, high-spirited to a fault, said to the king, “Your majesty, the deposition of John be on our heads.” As a last resource, the bishops on John’s side, to the number of the days of the holy fast,18 approached the king and queen in the shrines of the martyrs, and besought them with tears to spare the Church of Christ, remembering especially the Paschal festival, and those already prepared 19 for the sacrament of the new birth to be received on that day, and to restore to her her prelate.20 The request was unheeded; Paul of Crateia 21 went so far as to say, with fearless out-spokenness, “Eudoxia, fear God, and pity your own children; do not dishonour the festival of Christ by the shedding of blood.”

The Easier Vigil

So the forty bishops returned to their lodgings, and spent the night without sleep, some weeping, others grieving, others again held inactive by a stupor of pacificism which dulled their minds-according as their individual feelings disposed them. However, those of John’s priests who had the fear of God in their hearts, gathered the faithful laity in the public baths, called the baths of Constans, and occupied the night vigil 22 in reading aloud the divine oracles, or in baptizing the catechumens, as usual at the Paschal festival. These proceedings were reported by those corrupters of mind and perverters of sense, Antiochus, Severianus, and Acacius, to their champions, with the demand that the people should be prevented from assembling there. The magistrate on duty objected that it was night, and that the crowds of people were large; some regrettable incident might well occur. Acacius and his party urged against this: “Not a soul has stayed in the churches; we are afraid that if the king goes to church and finds no one there, he may recognize the affection of the people for John, and condemn us as slanderers, especially after our telling him that there is absolutely no one who is kindly disposed towards him, but that he is regarded as an outlaw.” So the magistrate, under protest, on the ground of what was likely to result, granted them the services of one Lucius, reported to be a Greek, and his commando of armed men, giving him instructions to go and call the people, gently, to the church. This he did, but as they would not obey, he returned to Acacius and his party, and explained the zeal and dense numbers of the people. Hearing this, they seduced him with golden words,23 and promises of further promotion, urging him to hinder the glory of the Lord; instructing him either to bring the people to church by verbal persuasion, or to excite them, and by drastic action prevent the festival from being celebrated.

The Outrages in the Church

So Lucius at once set out upon his mission, accompanied by the clergy of Acacius’ party. This was in the second watch of the night; for in our parts of the world they keep the people at church till the first cock-crow. He took 400 Thracian swordsmen (the same number that Esau had), newly enlisted, and absolutely reckless, and at a moment’s notice threw himself, like a savage wolf, with the clergy to guide his movements, upon the crowd of people, hacking a way through with flashing swords. He pressed forwards to the blessed water within, to stop those who were being initiated into (the sacrament of) the Saviour’s resurrection, pinioned the deacon, and poured away the sacramental elements;24 he beat the priests, men advanced in years, about the head with bludgeons, until the laver was dyed with blood. Sad it was to see that angelic night, in which even demons fall prostrate in terror, turned into a labyrinth.25 Here were women, stripped for baptism, running by the side of their husbands, glad so to escape in dishonour, in their terror of murder or dishonour; here was a man, with a wounded hand, making off, crying; another fellow dragging after him a maiden whose clothes he had torn off. All of them were carrying away loot which they had pillaged.

The Devotion of the Faithful

So those priests and deacons who were seized were thrown into the gaol; the better-class lay folk were expelled from the capital. Orders were issued one after the other, containing various threats against those who would not renounce communion with John. Yet in spite of all this, the bishops of whom I have told devoted themselves to their duties in the open air all the more earnestly; and the gathering of those who love Christian teaching, or rather, love God, was not brought to an end. As we read in the book of Exodus, the more they killed them, the more numerous they were.

Further Imprisonments

So when the king went out next day, to take exercise in the plain beside the city, he saw the waste ground round Pempton 26 clothed in white; and in astonishment at the sight of the newly baptized, thick as blossoms in spring (there were about 3000 of them), he asked the guard what was the great crowd gathered there. Instead of telling him the truth, they said that they were the mis-believers; 27 so as to bring upon them the wrath of the king. Hearing of this incident, those who were responsible, for the affair, the champions of envy, sent to the suburb 28 the most pitiless of their followers, to scatter the audience and arrest the teachers. So once more some few of the clergy, and a larger number of the laity, were arrested.

Blessed are the Poor in Spirit

Deac. Most blessed father, how was it that, when they were so many that the newly baptized alone numbered 3000, these few soldiers mastered them, and broke up the assemblage?

Bish. There is no indication here of small numbers, nor proof of want of zeal. It only shows their exceeding piety, and proves their attention to their teachers, who continually urged them to cultivate a peaceful habit of mind.

And Theodorus said—

Deac. Excellently spoken; certainly it was not to be expected that men who had learnt prudence and gentleness from the holy John should maintain his cause by folly and turbulence.

Notes

  1. “On the third day after his deprivation”; the civil authorities, with the sanction of the Emperor, instigated by Eudoxia, carrying out the resolution of the so-called “Synod.” “He went out unknown to the people, for fear of causing a disturbance; but immediately the king, the synod, and, above all, Theophilus, were bitterly censured. It was pointed out that Theophilus had immediately communicated with the Tall Brethren, whom he had called heretics, and Severian caused strong indignation by a sermon concerning Chrysostom’s pride” (Soz. viii. 18). The Emperor was compelled to order his return by the strong feelings aroused.
  2. On the other side of the Bosphorus.
  3. Apparently an earthquake. Eudoxia herself wrote, begging him to return: “I am innocent, I knew nothing of what was being done. I cannot forget that you baptized my children.”
  4. He refused to enter the church, on the ground that the synod which deposed him must also reinstate him; but the vast crowds who had welcomed him insisted on his pronouncing the “Peace be with you,” and giving an address, which is still preserved; in it he speaks very favourably of the Empress. He maintained that all this was done under compulsion, and that he cannot therefore be accused of the breach of canon law alleged below (p. 76). But no man can be compelled to speak; his natural impetuosity overcame him at the sight of the sympathetic flock. A synod of sixty bishops met in Constantinople, and annulled the proceedings at The Oak, declaring that Chrysostom still held his bishopric (Soz. viii. 19).
  5. Feeling ran so high in regard to the condemnation by the “Synod” of Heracleides (p. 126, n), accused of Origenism in his absence, that sanguinary tumults took place in the streets.
  6. By Can. XII. of the Synod of Antioch (a.d. 341), any bishop who after deposition appealed to the civil power was to be ipso facto irrevocably deposed. The number of bishops present at Antioch was ninety-seven, of whom forty belonged to the party of Eusebius, a “semi-Arian” (i. e. one who denied the eternal Godhead of the Son). It seems probable that these had remained after the others had returned home, and passed this and other canons on their own account.
  7. Rom. i. 8. So Cyprian, Ep. iv., objecting to an appeal made to Cornelius, Bishop of Rome, against the decisions of an African synod, says that they “forgot that it was the Romans, whose faith is applauded in the preaching of the Apostle.”
  8. Laodicea in Lycaonia, so called from the furnaces in connection with the mines (W. M. Ramsay).
  9. The famous heretic, who maintained that “there was a time when the Son was not”; against whom Athanasius maintained the Catholic Faith.
  10. A.n. 343; about a hundred and seventy bishops were present. The eastern bishops objected to the presence of Athanasius as having been deposed, but they were outvoted. Pall., L. H., lxiii. 1 has the same note of time in reference to Athanasius—“in the time of Constantius the king”—of the eastern, Constans being emperor of the western empire.
  11. Julius was Bishop of Rome at the time; Liberius succeeded him in 352. At this council it was determined that any bishop who considered himself aggrieved might appeal to Julius, Bishop of Rome, for a re-trial before such neighbouring bishops as he should appoint. The canon applied only to Julius personally, to cover the exigencies of the moment; Athanasius would ordinarily have appealed to the Emperor, but as Constantius, Emperor of the East, was an Arian, Julius was for this turn substituted for him.
  12. See p. 147, 11.
  13. Six of Chrysostom’s letters are addressed to him. He was deposed, but in 414 restored to his see.
  14. In that case, they admit themselves to be Arian heretics.
  15. Eudoxia once more turned against him at this time. Her statue had been set up in the square before the church, and its inauguration was attended by disorderly and pagan rejoicings, against which Chrysostom protested (January 403). On the feast of the Beheading of John the Baptist, he was alleged to have begun his sermon with the words, “Again doth Herodias rave, again does she ask for the head of John.” The Emperor sent him word that he would not communicate at the Christmas festival; but Chrysostom declared himself ready to meet the charge of attacking the Empress, and the question of re-entry was made the issue.
  16. They wished to anticipate the signs of popular good-will likely to be shown by the crowds attending the festival.
  17. “Episcopus,” “overseer” (Acts xx. 28, addressed to the “elders”). Cicero calls Pompey “Episcopus of Campania” (ad Att. vii. 11). So 1 Macc. i. 51, LXX. The verb is used by Pall., L. H., xxxv. 10, where he himself playfully says, “I bishop the kitchens, the tables, and the pots.” “God is the true bishop of the heart” (Wisd. i. 6).
  18. The name of Lent is “Tessarakoste,” “the fortieth (day) ”; it is still called so in the Greek Church.
  19. “ Initiated into the mysteries” of the Creed and the Lord’s Prayer. “Those who are initiated will know what is likely to have happened amid such disorder; I must keep silence, lest any uninitiated should read my narrative” (Soz. viii. 21, in relating these proceedings).
  20. Lit. “priest”; cf. p. 35.
  21. In Bithynia.
  22. Jerome (in Matt. xxv.) speaks of the apostolic tradition not to dismiss the congregation before midnight; Tertullian warns against marriage with a heathen, who will not allow his wife to be absent all night for the Paschal solemnities. Cf. p. 17, n.
  23. Possibly the first two letters of the word for “gifts” have been dropped out of the text, leaving that for “words.”
  24. “Symbols” (p. 64).
  25. In the labyrinth of Crete, according to Greek folk-lore, lurked the minotaur, a monster to which were given seven Athenian youths and seven maidens every ninth year, until he was slain by Theseus.
  26. “The Fifth,” because five miles from the Forum.
  27. “Heterodoxi.”
  28. Lit. “the back”; so p. 29.

· Contents ·